Summary

In US. Bank Natl. Assn. v Mathon, 29 Misc3d 1228 (A), 920 NYS2d 245 (Sup Ct, Suffolk County 2010), the borrowers continued to send the lender nine extra payments in reliance and compliance with a letter from the lender's servicer subsequent to the trial modification agreement expressly promising that "If you make all [3] trial period payments on lime and comply with all applicable program guidelines, you will have qualified for a final modification" and the lender's representatives verbally informed the borrowers that the underwriter had approved the final modification.