From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urbanite Wine Merchants, Inc. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 17, 2020
189 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12678 Index No. 101858/19 Case No. 2020-03014

12-17-2020

In re URBANITE WINE MERCHANTS, INC., Petitioner–Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, Respondent–Appellant.

Gary Meyerhoff, New York State Liquor Authority, New York (Mark D. Frering of counsel), for appellant. Mehler & Buscemi, New York (Martin P. Mehler of counsel), for respondent.


Gary Meyerhoff, New York State Liquor Authority, New York (Mark D. Frering of counsel), for appellant.

Mehler & Buscemi, New York (Martin P. Mehler of counsel), for respondent.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Gesmer, Kern, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John J. Kelley, J.), entered January 29, 2020, granting the petition to vacate and annul the determination of respondent New York State Liquor Authority (SLA), dated November 12, 2019, which disapproved petitioner's application for a retail liquor license for off-premises consumption, and ordering that a license be issued, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the judgment vacated, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed, without costs.

SLA's determination to disapprove the application of petitioner had a rational basis, was not arbitrary and capricious, and should not have been disturbed. On this record, SLA rationally concluded that petitioner failed to demonstrate that the issuing of a license would serve the "public convenience and advantage" in accordance with Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 63(6), where there were four preexisting liquor stores within 0.3 miles of petitioner's proposed new store (one of which was licensed earlier the same year), there was no evidence of increased demand for alcoholic beverages based upon population or revenue reports from nearby stores, and no showing that the public was not being adequately served by the existing stores (see Matter of Sinacore v. New York State Liq. Auth., 21 N.Y.2d 379, 288 N.Y.S.2d 51, 235 N.E.2d 113 [1968] ; Matter of One St. Mark's Place Wines & Liqs. v. New York State Liq. Auth., 82 A.D.2d 734, 439 N.Y.S.2d 640 [1st Dept. 1981] ).


Summaries of

Urbanite Wine Merchants, Inc. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 17, 2020
189 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Urbanite Wine Merchants, Inc. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Urbanite Wine Merchants, Inc., Petitioner-Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 17, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7684
134 N.Y.S.3d 178

Citing Cases

Senter v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth.

e Bar Coalition v New York State Liquor Auth., 12 Mise.3d 1192[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51544[U], *8 [Sup Ct, N.Y.…

Gunhill Liquor Warehouse Corp. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth.

NYSLA also stated that it reviewed the sales numbers that petitioner had submitted but gave them little…