From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 8, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-8

In the Matter of Cedric TURNER, petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, etc., respondent.

Cedric Turner, Malone, N.Y., appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Ann P. Zybert of counsel), for respondent.


Cedric Turner, Malone, N.Y., appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Ann P. Zybert of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Norman R. Bezio, Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, on behalf of Brian *756 Fischer, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated January 15, 2010, which affirmed a determination of a hearing officer dated November 12, 2009, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding that the petitioner violated prison rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2[b][14][i] ) by possessing contraband classified as a weapon, and imposing a penalty.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

The possibility that “the weapon [in question] could have been placed in the [petitioner's cell] door track by another inmate” ( Matter of Jimenez v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 771, 771, 927 N.Y.S.2d 804) did not negate the existence of substantial evidence to support the determination that the petitioner violated prison rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2[b][14][I] ) by possessing contraband classified as a weapon ( id.; see Matter of Daughtry v. Bezio, 84 A.D.3d 1623, 922 N.Y.S.2d 664; Matter of McEwen v. Goord, 32 A.D.3d 1116, 821 N.Y.S.2d 477; Matter of Hammond v. Selsky, 28 A.D.3d 1000, 812 N.Y.S.2d 720; Matter of Shackleford v. Goord, 3 A.D.3d 622, 769 N.Y.S.2d 910; Matter of Nieves v. Goord, 2 A.D.3d 1173, 768 N.Y.S.2d 711; cf. Matter of Price v. Phillips, 4 A.D.3d 364, 770 N.Y.S.2d 882).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

MASTRO, A.P.J., HALL, LOTT and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Turner v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 8, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Turner v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Cedric TURNER, petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 8, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3654
943 N.Y.S.2d 755

Citing Cases

Derti v. Annucci

The author of the misbehavior report testified as to the difficulty of reaching the hidden cellular phone…