From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1861
18 Cal. 415 (Cal. 1861)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Fifth District.

         Action against a Sheriff for $ 2,072 damages for that much money alleged to have been wrongfully seized by him on an illegal assessment for taxes. The complaint was verified; and the defendant not having answered, plaintiff, when the cause was called for trial, moved that the default of defendant be entered, and that plaintiff have judgment according to the prayer of the complaint. Motion denied, plaintiff excepting, and then introducing certain evidence. Subsequently, the case having been taken under advisement, the Court dismissed the complaint and gave defendant judgment for costs. Plaintiff appeals.

         COUNSEL:

         L. Quint, for Appellant.


         JUDGES: Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Field, C. J. and Baldwin, J. concurring.

         OPINION

          COPE, Judge

         The plaintiff was entitled to a judgment upon the complaint, and the Court erred in requiring proof of the facts therein stated. The complaint was verified, and the failure of the defendant to answer was an admission of the facts charged. No proof was necessary to enable the Court to render the proper judgment.

         Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.


Summaries of

Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1861
18 Cal. 415 (Cal. 1861)
Case details for

Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:TUOLUMNE REDEMPTION COMPANY v. PATTERSON

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1861

Citations

18 Cal. 415 (Cal. 1861)

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass’n v. Fox

Defendant's Default Admitted the Material Allegations of Plaintiff's Complaint, Including His Revolving…

Tulley v. Tranor

The Court could not do otherwise under the pleadings, all evidence introduced as to the value being wholly…