From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 21, 2022
204 A.D.3d 1286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

533644

04-21-2022

In the Matter of Clarence TUCKER, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Clarence Tucker, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Martin Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.


Clarence Tucker, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Martin Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Pritzker and Ceresia, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's institutional account. Accordingly, as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Dominguez v. Wendland , 196 A.D.3d 991, 991–992, 148 N.Y.S.3d 398 [2021] ; Matter of Santana v. Annucci, 190 A.D.3d 1182, 1183, 136 N.Y.S.3d 800 [2021] ).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Pritzker and Ceresia, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 21, 2022
204 A.D.3d 1286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Tucker v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Clarence TUCKER, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 21, 2022

Citations

204 A.D.3d 1286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
165 N.Y.S.3d 388

Citing Cases

Valdez-Cruz v. Collado

To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary…

Perkins v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…