From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Upson v. Rich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 21, 2021
190 A.D.3d 1182 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

531642

01-21-2021

In the Matter of Jamel UPSON, Petitioner, v. John RICH, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Jamel Upson, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.


Jamel Upson, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Mirabella v. Colvin, 172 A.D.3d 1807, 1807, 100 N.Y.S.3d 783 [2019] ; Matter of Billups v. Annucci, 170 A.D.3d 1300, 1301, 93 N.Y.S.3d 914 [2019] ).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Upson v. Rich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jan 21, 2021
190 A.D.3d 1182 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Upson v. Rich

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jamel Upson, Petitioner, v. John Rich, as Superintendent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 21, 2021

Citations

190 A.D.3d 1182 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 353
136 N.Y.S.3d 799

Citing Cases

Stubbs v. Venettozzi

Although not referenced by the Attorney General, the penalty imposed included a recommended loss of good…

Stubbs v. Venettozzi

Although not referenced by the Attorney General, the penalty imposed included a recommended loss of good…