From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Town of Babylon v. Lizza Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1993
191 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 1, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hand, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 20, 1990, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated January 18, 1991, made upon reargument and renewal, and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated January 18, 1991, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff and the third-party defendant are awarded one bill of costs.

In the mid to late 1970's, the third-party defendant Suffolk County contracted with, among others, the defendant third-party plaintiff, Lizza Industries, Inc. (hereinafter Lizza), to install a vast sewer system throughout Suffolk County, including the area under the control of the plaintiff Town of Babylon (hereinafter the Town). Sometime after the sewer system was installed, the area surrounding the sewer lines settled, causing damage to the adjacent roadways, sidewalks, curbs, subterranean water mains, and pipes. This suit represents one of many commenced by various plaintiffs against Lizza and other contractors. The gravamen of the Town's complaint is that Lizza failed to properly backfill the areas where it excavated. Consequently, the Town's water mains and pipes were damaged because the backfill provided insufficient subterranean support. The Town, asserting that it is a third-party beneficiary of the contracts between Lizza and Suffolk County, asserted causes of action sounding, inter alia, in breach of contract, trespass, and negligence. Thereafter, Lizza served a third-party complaint on Suffolk County seeking indemnity and contribution on all claims made by the Town. Suffolk County moved to dismiss the third-party complaint and the Town cross-moved for partial summary judgment adjudging it a third-party beneficiary under the Suffolk County contracts. Lizza then cross-moved to dismiss all of the Town's causes of action sounding in tort and to dismiss Suffolk County's counterclaim. The Supreme Court granted Suffolk County's motion to dismiss the third-party complaint, and denied Lizza's cross motion to dismiss the Town's tort causes of action and to dismiss Suffolk County's counterclaim for fees and costs incurred in the instant lawsuit. Further, the court granted the Town partial summary judgment, holding that it was a third-party beneficiary under the contracts in question.

For the reasons stated in Suffolk County Water Auth. v. J.D. Posillico, Inc. ( 191 A.D.2d 422 [decided herewith]) which involved virtually identical issues, we affirm. Lawrence, J.P., Eiber, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Town of Babylon v. Lizza Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1993
191 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Town of Babylon v. Lizza Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TOWN OF BABYLON, Respondent, v. LIZZA INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
593 N.Y.S.2d 1001

Citing Cases

Vill. of Lindenhurst v. J.D. Posillico, Inc.

In an action against a construction contractor, the three-year statute of limitations to recover damages for…

Suffolk Cnty. Water Auth. v. Hendrickson Bros., Inc.

The Settlement Agreement reveals that the parties acknowledged that the joint venture was dissolved at some…