From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Theis v. Langworthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 29, 2000
270 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 29, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J. — Default Judgment.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., GREEN, WISNER, SCUDDER AND KEHOE, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff's motion for a default judgment based on defendant's delay in appearing in the action in response to plaintiff's summons with notice and properly granted defendant an extension of time to file a notice of appearance and demand for the complaint ( see, CPLR 3012 [d]). Defendant provided a reasonable excuse for the brief delay and established a meritorious defense to the complaint, plaintiff was not prejudiced by the delay, and public policy favors the resolution of cases on their merits ( see, Kaiser v. Delaney, 255 A.D.2d 362; Cleary v. East Syracuse-Minoa Cent. School Dist., 248 A.D.2d 1005; Pollack v. Eskander, 191 A.D.2d 1022, 1023, appeal dismissed 81 N.Y.2d 1067).


Summaries of

Theis v. Langworthy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 29, 2000
270 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Theis v. Langworthy

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. THEIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TED LANGWORTHY, D/B/A BULLFROG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 29, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
705 N.Y.S.2d 308

Citing Cases

Village of Parish v. Weichert

Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in extending the time for plaintiff to serve a reply to the…