Opinion
Case No. 2D18-4251
03-12-2021
Donald H. SWEENEY, Appellant, v. Deborah G. SWEENEY, Appellee.
Kelly A. Overfield and Ashley Brown of Ayers Overfield, and Crowe, Attorneys at Law, Tampa, (withdrew after briefing); Daniel H. Crowe of Law Offices of Daniel H. Crowe, P.A., (substituted as counsel of record), Tampa, for Appellant. Michael Buchholtz of The Law Office of Michael Buchholtz, Saint Petersburg, for Appellee.
Kelly A. Overfield and Ashley Brown of Ayers Overfield, and Crowe, Attorneys at Law, Tampa, (withdrew after briefing); Daniel H. Crowe of Law Offices of Daniel H. Crowe, P.A., (substituted as counsel of record), Tampa, for Appellant.
Michael Buchholtz of The Law Office of Michael Buchholtz, Saint Petersburg, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. We affirm the amended final judgment denying modification of alimony and adjudicating Appellant in indirect civil contempt in all respects save one. The circuit court's determination that Appellee was entitled to an award of attorney's fees, while reserving jurisdiction as to the amount, is not an issue we can review. See Wolf v. Wolf, 296 So. 3d 479, 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) ("An order that determines entitlement to attorney's fees without a determination of the amount is a nonappealable, nonfinal order."); Lockett v. Lockett, 235 So. 3d 1003, 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) ; McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So. 2d 612, 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as to that issue.
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.