From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sumpter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 26, 1988
523 So. 2d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-3060.

April 26, 1988.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Ellen J. Morphonios, Judge.

Lonny Lawrence Sumpter, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Fariba N. Komeily, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.


Appellant's motion for post-conviction relief, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, was filed while his appeal to this court (No. 87-1969) was pending and without jurisdiction having been relinquished to the trial court to consider the motion. We affirm the denial of the motion upon a holding that the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider it. State v. Meneses, 392 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1981); Bryan v. State, 470 So.2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Marshall v. State, 428 So.2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant's right to file such motion after disposition of his pending appeal and the return of jurisdiction to the trial court.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Sumpter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 26, 1988
523 So. 2d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Sumpter v. State

Case Details

Full title:LONNY LAWRENCE SUMPTER, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 26, 1988

Citations

523 So. 2d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Campbell v. State

Therefore, although we affirm the lower court's order denying the motion, we do so without prejudice to…