From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 15, 1983
428 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-1749.

February 15, 1983.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Maria M. Korvick, Judge.

Charlie Marshall, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


It appearing that the appellant's motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 was filed and considered and ruled upon by the trial court while appellant's petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court was pending, and that jurisdiction to consider the Rule 3.850 motion was not relinquished to the trial court, the trial court's denial of the appellant's Rule 3.850 motion is affirmed on the sole ground that the trial court was without jurisdiction over the motion, without prejudice to the right of the appellant to file such motion after disposition of his pending appeal and the return of jurisdiction to the trial court. See State v. Meneses, 392 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1981).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 15, 1983
428 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Marshall v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLIE MARSHALL, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 15, 1983

Citations

428 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Sumpter v. State

We affirm the denial of the motion upon a holding that the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider…