From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stoner v. Stoner

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 13, 2022
383 N.C. 677 (N.C. 2022)

Opinion

No. 234P22

12-13-2022

Tiffany Monique STONER v. Ajamu Hamindi STONER

Richard B. Johnson, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For Stoner, Tiffany Monique. Ajamu Hamindi Stoner, For Stoner, Ajamu Hamindi.


Richard B. Johnson, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For Stoner, Tiffany Monique.

Ajamu Hamindi Stoner, For Stoner, Ajamu Hamindi.

ORDER

Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Review Order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals is decided as follows: plaintiff's certiorari petition is allowed for the limited purpose of vacating the order entered in this case by the Court of Appeals on 7 July 2020 that dismissed plaintiff's appeal from the Order for Alimony and Attorney's Fees entered by Judge Jena P. Culler on 16 December 2019 and the Order Declaring December 2017 Order Permanent Custody and Child Support Order entered by Judge Jena P. Culler on 22 January 2022 and remanding this case to the Court of Appeals with instructions to consider plaintiff's challenges to the two orders in question on the merits in accordance with N.C.G.S. § 50-19.1 (2021) (allowing interlocutory appeals from final orders finally addressing claims for absolute divorce, divorce from bed and board, the validity of a premarital agreement [ ], child custody, child support, alimony, or equitable distribution," with "[a] party [ ] not forfeit[ing] the right to appeal under this section if the party fails to immediately appeal from an order or judgment described in this section").

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 13th day of December 2022.


Summaries of

Stoner v. Stoner

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 13, 2022
383 N.C. 677 (N.C. 2022)
Case details for

Stoner v. Stoner

Case Details

Full title:Tiffany Monique STONER v. Ajamu Hamindi STONER

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Dec 13, 2022

Citations

383 N.C. 677 (N.C. 2022)
880 S.E.2d 677

Citing Cases

State v. Dixon

At face value, the traditional emphasis on the Defendant’s burden at step three of Batson should operate to…