From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stone v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2017
63 N.Y.S.3d 270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

11-09-2017

In the Matter of Earl STONE, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Earl Stone, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Earl Stone, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. We note that "petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination" (Matter of West v. Annucci, 134 A.D.3d 1379, 1380, 21 N.Y.S.3d 643 [2015] ; see Matter of Gega v. Annucci, 149 A.D.3d 1439, 1439, 50 N.Y.S.3d 893 [2017] ). Accordingly, and inasmuch as petitioner has otherwise received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Terry v. Annucci, 153 A.D.3d 1019, 1019, 56 N.Y.S.3d 895 [2017] ; Matter of Brown v. Venettozzi, 148 A.D.3d 1446, 1446, 48 N.Y.S.3d 650 [2017] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.

PETERS, P.J., GARRY, LYNCH, CLARK and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stone v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2017
63 N.Y.S.3d 270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Stone v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Earl STONE, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 9, 2017

Citations

63 N.Y.S.3d 270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Citing Cases

Liggins v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…