From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Venettozzi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-23-2017

In the Matter of Johnny B. BROWN, Petitioner, v. Donald VENETTOZZI, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Johnny B. Brown, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Johnny B. Brown, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Boyd v. Annucci, 142 A.D.3d 1214, 1214–1215, 37 N.Y.S.3d 458 [2016] ; Matter of Flood v. Prack, 141 A.D.3d 1070, 1070–1071, 35 N.Y.S.3d 671 [2016] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

GARRY, J.P., LYNCH, ROSE, CLARK and MULVEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Venettozzi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Brown v. Venettozzi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Johnny B. BROWN, Petitioner, v. Donald VENETTOZZI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 23, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 2115
48 N.Y.S.3d 650

Citing Cases

Worth v. Venettozzi

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

Stone v. Annucci

We note that "petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary…