From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thorn

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Mar 12, 1971
82 N.M. 431 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. 547.

March 12, 1971.

Appeal from the District Court of Roosevelt County, Dee C. Blythe, D. J.

Fred T. Hensley, Portales, for appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Thomas L. Dunigan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


OPINION


Thorn pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana under § 54-7-13, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2). This is the general narcotics law which contains a mandatory sentence provision. Under State v. Riley, 82 N.M. 235, 478 P.2d 563 (1970), and State v. Rendleman (Ct.App.) 82 N.M. 346, 481 P.2d 708, decided February 12, 1971, the conviction and sentence is reversed.

At the hearings, in connection with the above charge, the trial court expressed the point of view that the state had the option of proceeding under the general statute, or the special statute which is § 54-5-14, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2). Thorn's appeal contends it was error to charge him under the general statute. We agree.

The rule fixed in Riley applies to the Thorn case.

The judgment and sentence of Thorn in the trial court is reversed. The cause is remanded with instructions to vacate the judgment and sentence and dismiss the charge under which Thorn pleaded guilty.

It is so ordered.

SPIESS, C. J., and WOOD, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Thorn

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Mar 12, 1971
82 N.M. 431 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

State v. Thorn

Case Details

Full title:STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas R. THORN…

Court:Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: Mar 12, 1971

Citations

82 N.M. 431 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971)
483 P.2d 312

Citing Cases

State v. Madrid

We do not consider the constitutional question raised because, in our opinion, the trial court proceeded…

State v. Gonzales

We have held that prosecutions under § 54-7-14, supra, for giving away or possession of marijuana cannot…