From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rendleman

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Feb 12, 1971
82 N.M. 346 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. 585.

February 12, 1971.

Appeal from the District Court, Grant County, Norman Hodges, C. J.

C. N. Morris, Silver City, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Thomas L. Dunigan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-appellee.


OPINION


Rendleman was convicted and sentenced for the unlawful possession of marijuana under § 54-7-13 N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2), known as the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act. Rendleman appealed. We reverse.

This case falls directly within State v. Riley, 82 N.M. 235, 478 P.2d 563 (Ct.App.) decided December 11, 1970, in which § 54-7-14 of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act was held inapplicable, and § 54-5-14 N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2), a special act, was held operative.

The conviction and sentence are reversed. The cause is remanded with instruction to vacate the conviction judgment and sentence, and dismiss the charge under which Rendleman was prosecuted.

It is so ordered.

WOOD and HENDLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Rendleman

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Feb 12, 1971
82 N.M. 346 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

State v. Rendleman

Case Details

Full title:STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald B. RENDLEMAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: Feb 12, 1971

Citations

82 N.M. 346 (N.M. Ct. App. 1971)
481 P.2d 708

Citing Cases

State v. Thorn

This is the general narcotics law which contains a mandatory sentence provision. Under State v. Riley, 82…

State v. Madrid

We do not consider the constitutional question raised because, in our opinion, the trial court proceeded…