From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sturdivant

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1941
17 S.E.2d 661 (N.C. 1941)

Opinion

(Filed 10 December, 1941.)

Criminal Law § 80 —

An appeal will be dismissed upon motion of the Attorney-General for failure of defendant to file a brief, Rule of Practice in the Supreme Court No. 28, but when defendant has been convicted of a capital felony this will be done only after a careful examination of the record fails to disclose material defect.

MOTION by State to dismiss appeal for failure to file brief.

Attorney-General McMullan for the State.


Defendant was tried before Burney, J., at the September Term, 1941, Superior Court of Bladen County, on bill of indictment charging him with the capital felony of murder of one Ida Mae Sturdivant. There was a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree. Thereupon judgment that defendant suffer the penalty of death by asphyxiation, as provided by law, was entered. Defendant excepted and appealed.


Defendant, having been permitted to appeal in forma pauperis, docketed in this Court typewritten record and case on appeal but he failed to file a brief. Thereupon the Attorney-General moved to dismiss under Rule No. 28. In re Bailey, 180 N.C. 30, 103 S.E. 896; Comrs. v. Dickson, 190 N.C. 330, 129 S.E. 814.

As is the custom with us in criminal causes involving the death penalty, before acting upon the motion of the Attorney-General, we have carefully examined the record. No material defect appears therein. We have likewise considered the exceptions appearing in the case on appeal. They are without merit. The motion to dismiss is allowed.

Judgment affirmed.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Sturdivant

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1941
17 S.E.2d 661 (N.C. 1941)
Case details for

State v. Sturdivant

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. ROBERT STURDIVANT

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1941

Citations

17 S.E.2d 661 (N.C. 1941)
220 N.C. 535