From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comrs. v. Dickson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1925
129 S.E. 726 (N.C. 1925)

Opinion

(Filed 21 October, 1925.)

Appeal and Error — Rules of Court — Briefs — Judgments.

Where the appellant has not filed a brief in the Supreme Court, under the rule the judgment appealed from will be affirmed on appellee's motion, if upon examination of the record proper no error appears.

APPEAL by defendant from Sinclair, J., September, 1925, at chambers, from CUMBERLAND.

Dye Clark for plaintiff.

No counsel for defendant.


Controversy without action, submitted on an agreed statement of facts, verified by J. T. Martin, chairman of the Board of Commissioners of Cumberland County, and John S. Harris, Vice-President of Stranahan, Harris Oatis, Inc.

The proceeding is to determine the validity of certain school bonds and the binding effect of a joint bid made therefor by the defendants.

The case is brought to us for review from a judgment declaring the bonds to be valid and adjudging that "the defendant herein, the purchaser of said bonds, be, and it is hereby required to complete the purchase of said bonds in conformity with its contract."


As the appellant has filed no brief in this Court, and no error is made to appear from an examination of the record proper, we must affirm the judgment on motion of appellee. Mfg. Co. v. Simmons, 97 N.C. 89; Smith v. Mfg. Co., 151 N.C. 260; Jones v. R. R., 153 N.C. 419; Davis v. Wall, 142 N.C. 450.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Comrs. v. Dickson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1925
129 S.E. 726 (N.C. 1925)
Case details for

Comrs. v. Dickson

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY v. R. S. DICKSON CO., AND…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1925

Citations

129 S.E. 726 (N.C. 1925)
129 S.E. 726

Citing Cases

State v. Sturdivant

Thereupon the Attorney-General moved to dismiss under Rule No. 28. In re Bailey, 180 N.C. 30, 103 S.E. 896;…

State v. Peele

Thereupon the Attorney-General moved to dismiss under Rule No. 28. In re Bailey, 180 N.C. 30, 103 S.E. 986;…