From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clarke

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 19, 2014
147 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 5D13–1034.

2014-09-19

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Hernando Pelecio CLARKE, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Heather Pinder Rodriguez, Judge. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Steven N. Gosney, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Heather Pinder Rodriguez, Judge.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Steven N. Gosney, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the trial court's order granting Hernando Pelecio Clarke's motion to suppress. Because the trial court erred when it concluded that the law enforcement officer did not have probable cause to stop Clarke, an issue not contested below, we reverse and remand for consideration of the actual issues raised by the parties. See State v. Johns, 920 So.2d 1156, 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (reversing order granting motion to suppress, but remanding for further consideration because the trial court did not address whether the defendant's consent was voluntary).

The trial court's ruling that the initial stop was not warranted is erroneous as a matter of law, and not supported by its own findings of fact. See State v. Lee, 957 So.2d 76, 79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“[T]he decision to stop an automobile is reasonable for purposes of the Fourth Amendment where the police have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred.” (citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 809–10, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996) and Holland v. State, 696 So.2d 757, 759 (Fla.1997))); see also State v. Rodriguez, 904 So.2d 594, 598 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“A stop may be justified even in the absence of a traffic infraction when the vehicle is being operated in an unusual manner.”).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.




Summaries of

State v. Clarke

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sep 19, 2014
147 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Hernando Pelecio CLARKE, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Sep 19, 2014

Citations

147 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

State v. Nelson

Therefore, we reverse the orders under review and remand these cases to the trial court for consideration of…