From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Justus

Supreme Court of Washington.
Dec 6, 2017
189 Wn. 2d 1026 (Wash. 2017)

Summary

distinguishing "intentional acts to harm" as "not merely conduct which created an ‘unreasonable risk of harm’ "

Summary of this case from Beltran-Serrano v. City of Tacoma

Opinion

No. 94843-7

12-06-2017

STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent, v. Robert Charles JUSTUS, et al., Petitioners.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon-McCloud, considered at its December 5, 2017, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Justus

Supreme Court of Washington.
Dec 6, 2017
189 Wn. 2d 1026 (Wash. 2017)

distinguishing "intentional acts to harm" as "not merely conduct which created an ‘unreasonable risk of harm’ "

Summary of this case from Beltran-Serrano v. City of Tacoma
Case details for

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Justus

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent, v. Robert Charles JUSTUS…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Dec 6, 2017

Citations

189 Wn. 2d 1026 (Wash. 2017)
189 Wash. 2d 1026
406 P.3d 629

Citing Cases

Leahy v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Moreover, in that case, the remedy was to remand for an in camera hearing and here the trial court has…

Beltran-Serrano v. City of Tacoma

Id. § 17, at 302 (footnote omitted); see also Tegman v. Accident & Med. Investigations, Inc., 150 Wash.2d…