From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stacey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 10, 1964
165 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 4553.

June 10, 1964.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pinellas County; Joseph P. McNulty, Judge.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, Joseph F. McDermott, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

James W. Kynes, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.


This appeal is from an order of the trial court denying a motion for post conviction relief. The motion was deficient in failing to allege the insolvency of the appellant.

The order appealed is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant to file a motion under Criminal Procedure Rule No 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix alleging facts, if he can, showing his entitlement to relief.

Affirmed.

WHITE, Acting C.J., and ANDREWS and KANNER, (Ret.), JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stacey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 10, 1964
165 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Stacey v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY WALTER STACEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 10, 1964

Citations

165 So. 2d 222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. State

The motion for post conviction relief did not allege any matters for which such relief could be granted. See…

Riley v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed under the authority of Hinton v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 177 So.2d 522; Savage v. State,…