Riley v. State

Full title: JAMES RILEY, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 1, 1967

195 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

No. 7264.

March 1, 1967.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pinellas County; Joseph P. McNulty, Judge.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Carleton L. Weidemeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Hinton v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 177 So.2d 522; Savage v. State, Fla.App. 1963, 156 So.2d 566; Stacey v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 222; and Dias v. State, Fla.App. 1963, 158 So.2d 766.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C.J., and PIERCE and HOBSON, JJ., concur.