Opinion
October 24, 2000.
Steven B. Dorfman, for plaintiffs-respondents.
Elizabeth Anne Bannon, for defendant-appellant.
Sullivan, P.J., Nardelli, Rubin, Saxe, Friedman, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about February 25, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant's liability under Labor Law 240(1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff established a prima facie case with evidence that as he was descending from a 10-foot high scaffold, it tipped, causing him to fall to the ground (see, Arce v. 1133 Bldg. Corp., 257 A.D.2d 515; Garcia v. 1122 E. 180th St. Corp., 250 A.D.2d 550). Defendant's evidence that the scaffold was observed upright shortly after plaintiff's fall is insufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether the accident was due solely to plaintiff's fault (see, Wasilewski v. Museum of Modern Art, 260 A.D.2d 271). Nor is such issue raised by the fact that plaintiff had been using the scaffold for a month prior to the accident without indication of any problems.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.