From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seifert v. Corrections Corporation of America

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Feb 1, 2010
File No. 2:09 CV 119 (D. Vt. Feb. 1, 2010)

Opinion

File No. 2:09 CV 119.

February 1, 2010


ORDER


The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed January 7, 2010. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

The defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED and plaintiff's motion for removal and consolidation (Doc. 14) is DENIED. It is further ordered that plaintiff be allowed 30 days in which to file an amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint within this time period will result in dismissal of the case.


Summaries of

Seifert v. Corrections Corporation of America

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Feb 1, 2010
File No. 2:09 CV 119 (D. Vt. Feb. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Seifert v. Corrections Corporation of America

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Seifert, Plaintiff, v. Corrections Corporation of America…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Feb 1, 2010

Citations

File No. 2:09 CV 119 (D. Vt. Feb. 1, 2010)

Citing Cases

Cameron v. Menard

To prove that claim, Cameron must demonstrate that (a) as a transgender female, being housed in a male prison…

Cameron v. Menard

In order to prove her Eighth Amendment claim for failure to protect, Cameron must demonstrate that “[her]…