From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SEG Gateway, LLC v. Bay Circle Props., LLC (In re Bay Circle Props., LLC)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Aug 1, 2017
CASE NO. 15-58440-WLH (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Aug. 1, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 15-58440-WLH ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NO. 16-05334-WLH

08-01-2017

IN RE: BAY CIRCLE PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Debtor. SEG GATEWAY, LLC and GOOD GATEWAY, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. BAY CIRCLE PROPERTIES, LLC, CHITTRANJAN K. THAKKAR, and JON E. TAYLOR, Defendants.


IT IS ORDERED as set forth below:

CHAPTER 11 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JON E. TAYLOR'S MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Jon E. Taylor's ("Taylor") Motion to Dismiss and Amended Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss (together, "Motion") (Docket Nos. 7 & 9). Plaintiffs SEG Gateway, LLC and Good Gateway, LLC ("Plaintiffs") filed this adversary proceeding November 30, 2016 alleging the transfer of certain real property located at 6600 and 6610 Bay Circle, Norcross, Gwinnett County, Georgia ("Property") from Defendant Chittranjan K. Thakkar ("Thakkar") to Defendant Bay Circle Properties, LLC ("Bay Circle") was fraudulent under state law. The complaint also alleged Taylor aided and abetted the fraudulent transfer of the Property (Count II) and that Taylor and Thakkar engaged in conspiracy to commit a fraudulent transfer (Count III). In the Motion, Taylor argued Plaintiffs failed to state a claim for conspiracy because Taylor's actions were part of his representation of Thakkar and not for any personal benefit. He further argued that Plaintiffs failed to state a claim for aiding and abetting a fraudulent transfer because Taylor was neither the debtor nor the transferee, and therefore any such claim against Taylor is not cognizable in Georgia. Plaintiffs filed a response to the Motion, arguing Georgia law supports a cause of action for aiding and abetting fraud under O.C.G.A. § 51-12-30 and that ruling against Plaintiffs on the conspiracy claim would be premature without further hearing. After the Motion was filed, Bay Circle filed a motion seeking partial summary judgment, arguing that the Property was encumbered to such an extent that no fraudulent transfer could have occurred under the Georgia statute. The Court entered an order on August 1, 2017 granting summary judgment in favor of Bay Circle, finding that no fraudulent transfer occurred.

In the Motion, Taylor notes that his name is incorrectly listed in the complaint as "Jon E. Taylor", when it should be "John E. Taylor". Plaintiffs acknowledged this scrivner's error in their response, and stated that appropriate action would be taken to correct the error. As of the date of entry of this order, however, Taylor is still listed as "Jon E. Taylor" on the docket of this adversary proceeding, and the Court will continue to use Taylor's name as it is listed on the docket. --------

A claim for conspiracy is derivative in nature—in the absence of underlying liability, a conspiracy claim cannot exist. See Mustaqeem-Graydon v. SunTrust Bank, 258 Ga. App. 200, 207(6) (2002) (without an underlying tort, no liability exists for civil conspiracy). Because the Court determined in the August 1, 207 order that there is no liability for the alleged fraudulent transfer, Plaintiffs cannot state a claim for conspiracy. Likewise, aiding and abetting is a theory of secondary liability. See Kipperman v. Onex Corp., 2006 WL 8421931, at *27 n.19 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 15, 2006) ("The aiding and abetting claim lives on only so far as the underlying...claims are still extant."). The Court need not address the viability of a claim for aiding and abetting a fraudulent transfer or aiding and abetting common law fraud under O.C.G.A. § 51-12-30; for either claim, Plaintiffs would have to establish the existence of some underlying liability. Because the Court has determined that no such underlying liability exists, the aiding and abetting claim cannot stand against Taylor.

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, it is hereby

ORDERED that Taylor's Motion is GRANTED. Counts II and III of the Complaint are dismissed against Taylor.

The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Plaintiffs' counsel and counsel for all Defendants. Date: August 1, 2017

/s/ _________

Wendy L. Hagenau

U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge

END OF DOCUMENT

DISTRIBUTION LIST

Walter E. Jones

Balch & Bingham, LLP

Suite 700

30 Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd, NW

Atlanta, GA 30308

John A. Christy

J. Carole Thompson Hord

Jonathan A. Akins

1100 Peachtree St., NE Suite 800

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-4516

Richard L. Robbins

Suite 1120

999 Peachtree Street, NE

Atlanta, GA 30309-3996

Christine L. Mast

303 Peachtree St. NE

Suite 4000

Atlanta, GA 30308-3243


Summaries of

SEG Gateway, LLC v. Bay Circle Props., LLC (In re Bay Circle Props., LLC)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Aug 1, 2017
CASE NO. 15-58440-WLH (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Aug. 1, 2017)
Case details for

SEG Gateway, LLC v. Bay Circle Props., LLC (In re Bay Circle Props., LLC)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: BAY CIRCLE PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Debtor. SEG GATEWAY, LLC and…

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 1, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 15-58440-WLH (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Aug. 1, 2017)