From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Secallus v. Muscarelle

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 31, 1991
126 N.J. 288 (N.J. 1991)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1991 —

Decided October 31, 1991.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Michael B. Oropollo argued the cause for appellant ( Hoagland, Longo, Oropollo Moran, attorneys; Robert F. Colquhoun, II, on the brief).

Donald L. Letizia argued the cause for respondent ( Brian Granstrand, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 245 N.J. Super. 535, 586 A.2d 305 (1991).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, and STEIN — 7.


Summaries of

Secallus v. Muscarelle

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 31, 1991
126 N.J. 288 (N.J. 1991)
Case details for

Secallus v. Muscarelle

Case Details

Full title:GARY SECALLUS, PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH L. MUSCARELLE, A/K/A JOSEPH L…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 31, 1991

Citations

126 N.J. 288 (N.J. 1991)
597 A.2d 1083

Citing Cases

Vitty v. D.C.P. Corp.

Referring to this principle, Garage asserts that it should not be required under the agreement to indemnify…

Stevenson v. Keene Corp.

Borough of Matawan v. Monmouth County Bd. of Taxation, 51 N.J. 291, 298, 240 A.2d 8 (1968); Dixon v. Gassert,…