From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seals v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 9, 2020
No. 19-55582 (9th Cir. Mar. 9, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-55582

03-09-2020

JW SEALS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:18-cv-10104-R-JEM MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

J.W. Seals, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims arising from his denial of employment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a district court's dismissal under its local rules. Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). We vacate and remand.

The district court erred by not recognizing that Seals had filed his opposition before the district court had ruled on defendant's motion to dismiss. See Draper v. Coombs, 792 F.2d 915, 924 (9th Cir. 1986) (explaining that pro se litigants should be treated with "great leniency" when evaluating compliance with "the technical rules of civil procedure"). We vacate and remand for the district court to consider Seals's opposition in the first instance.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Seals v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 9, 2020
No. 19-55582 (9th Cir. Mar. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Seals v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:JW SEALS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 9, 2020

Citations

No. 19-55582 (9th Cir. Mar. 9, 2020)

Citing Cases

Wahab v. Wahab

The Ninth Circuit has recognized that district courts should treat self-represented “litigants . . . with…

Stephens v. Biden

.'” Seals v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist., 797 Fed.Appx. 327, 327 (9th Cir. 2020) (quoting Draper v. Coombs,…