holding plaintiff's own conduct in modifying note without defendant's consent and failing to pursue its right to enforce the guaranty within the statute of limitations was an intervening cause of plaintiff's injury
Summary of this case from Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v. TiltonJanuary 31, 2011.
Pleading — Sufficiency of Pleading — Fraud.
holding plaintiff's own conduct in modifying note without defendant's consent and failing to pursue its right to enforce the guaranty within the statute of limitations was an intervening cause of plaintiff's injury
Summary of this case from Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v. TiltonFull title:Saleh Holdings Group, Inc. v. Chernov
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Date published: Jan 31, 2011
Thus, NORD/LB's decision to sell the Notes was an "intervening direct cause" of their injury, precluding…
KOCH v. KYONG MINAssuming, arguendo, that the consent form was notarized outside of Plaintiff's presence or that her signature…