From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Bessen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 1987
126 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

January 26, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ferraro, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Because the defendant failed to move to strike the note of issue filed by the plaintiff within 20 days after its service, as was then required by 22 N.Y.CRR former 675.3, and, in fact, waited 17 months before submitting the motion to strike without offering a reasonable excuse for this excessive delay, the defendant is deemed to have waived his right to thereafter conduct a physical examination of the plaintiff (see, Bowen v. Fiore, 42 A.D.2d 960; Sloan v. Briggs Leasing Corp., 97 A.D.2d 818). Furthermore, the defendant failed to demonstrate the existence of any special or unusual circumstances, or that unanticipated conditions developed subsequent to the filing of the note of issue, which would warrant a contrary result (see, Levine v. McFarland, 98 A.D.2d 795). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Russell v. Bessen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 1987
126 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Russell v. Bessen

Case Details

Full title:DONALD E. RUSSELL, Respondent, v. HERBERT BESSEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 26, 1987

Citations

126 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Long Island College Hospital

The examination by the defendant Berkman shall proceed expeditiously at a time and place to be fixed in a…

Colwell v. Jantzer

Here, as it is well over twenty (20) days since defendant acquiesced to the statements set forth in the Note…