From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rizzo v. Nelson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 20, 2011
90 A.D.3d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-12-20

In the Matter of Paul RIZZO, petitioner, v. William K. NELSON, etc., et al., respondents.

Paul Rizzo, New City, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Roberta L. Martin of counsel), for respondent William K. Nelson.


Paul Rizzo, New City, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Roberta L. Martin of counsel), for respondent William K. Nelson.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent William K. Nelson, a Judge of the County Court, Rockland County, from presiding over a trial in a criminal action entitled People v. Rizzo, pending in the County Court, Rockland County, under Indictment No. 11–00114, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” ( Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569, 528 N.Y.S.2d 21, 523 N.E.2d 297; see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352, 509 N.Y.S.2d 493, 502 N.E.2d 170). The petitioner's underlying motion to dismiss the indictment was determined in an order of the County Court, Rockland County, dated June 7, 2011. The petitioner's remedy is to raise his claims on direct appeal from any judgment of conviction which may ultimately be rendered ( see Matter of Randall v. McGann, 76 A.D.3d 713, 906 N.Y.S.2d 511; see generally Billings v. Erlbaum, 306 A.D.2d 526, 761 N.Y.S.2d 865).

Accordingly, the petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rizzo v. Nelson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 20, 2011
90 A.D.3d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Rizzo v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Paul RIZZO, petitioner, v. William K. NELSON, etc., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 20, 2011

Citations

90 A.D.3d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
934 N.Y.S.2d 715
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 9334