From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Randall v. McGann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 31, 2010
76 A.D.3d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-06946.

August 31, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent, Robert C. McGann, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, from presiding over a trial in a criminal action entitled People v Randall, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under indictment No. 2864/09.

Mahler Harris, P.C., Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Stephen R. Mahler of counsel), for petitioner.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Brooke E. Barnes of counsel), nonparty pro se.

Before: Covello, J.P, Miller, Dickerson and Austin, JJ.


Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner's underlying motion to dismiss the indictment was determined in an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 16, 2010. The petitioner's remedy is to raise his claims on direct appeal from any judgment of conviction which may ultimately be rendered ( see generally Matter of Billings v Erlbaum, 306 AD2d 526).

Accordingly, the petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

In re Randall v. McGann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 31, 2010
76 A.D.3d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Randall v. McGann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PERCY RANDALL, Petitioner, v. ROBERT C. MCGANN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 31, 2010

Citations

76 A.D.3d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 6524
906 N.Y.S.2d 511
939 N.E.2d 809

Citing Cases

Rizzo v. Nelson

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and…

Randall v. McGann

Decided November 30, 2010. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 76 AD3d 713. Motions for Leave to Appeal…