From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Productive Recycling v. Town of Smithtown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 29, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.).


Ordered that the appeal and the cross appeal from the order dated January 27, 1994, are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, since that order was superseded by the order dated November 1, 1994, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated November 1, 1994, is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Neither the plaintiff nor the defendants is entitled to summary judgment. There is an issue of fact regarding whether the plaintiff materially breached or otherwise rendered unperformable its contract to recycle the defendant town's yard waste (see generally, CPLR 3212 [b]). Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Productive Recycling v. Town of Smithtown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Productive Recycling v. Town of Smithtown

Case Details

Full title:PRODUCTIVE RECYCLING, INC., Respondent-Appellant, v. TOWN OF SMITHTOWN et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 660

Citing Cases

Super PC Sys. v. Kaitryanna Pizza Inc.

Indeed, whether there has been a material breach is often an issue of fact, ill-suited for resolution on…

Germain v. Staten Island Boat Sales, Inc.

However, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the claim for punitive damages ( see, Zabas v. Kard, 194 A.D.2d…