finding no plain error in the Superior Court's decision to grant the motion to withdraw the guilty plea permitting the defendant to exercise his constitutional right to a jury trial
Summary of this case from Capers v. StateNo. 87, 2006.
December 17, 2007.
Appeal from the Superior Cr 0205013378.
Decisions without Published Opinions, Affirmed.
finding no plain error in the Superior Court's decision to grant the motion to withdraw the guilty plea permitting the defendant to exercise his constitutional right to a jury trial
Summary of this case from Capers v. Statedenying Pringle’s claim that the Superior Court erred in refusing to allow Pringle to represent himself because "[t]he record, however, does not support a finding that Pringle requested to represent himself. In fact, the motion included in Pringle’s appendix reflects that, after his conviction, he requested that trial counsel be discharged and that new counsel be appointed to represent him at sentencing"
Summary of this case from Thomas v. StateFull title:Pringle v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Dec 17, 2007
"[G]iven the timing of Pringle's motion, the State's lack of opposition to it, and the reasons Pringle set…
Thomas v. StateFinally, Thomas declined to proceed pro se once given the opportunity at his sentencing hearing.Id.; Pringle…