From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pringle v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Dec 17, 2007
941 A.2d 1019 (Del. 2007)

Summary

finding no plain error in the Superior Court's decision to grant the motion to withdraw the guilty plea permitting the defendant to exercise his constitutional right to a jury trial

Summary of this case from Capers v. State

Opinion

No. 87, 2006.

December 17, 2007.

Appeal from the Superior Cr 0205013378.


Decisions without Published Opinions, Affirmed.


Summaries of

Pringle v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Dec 17, 2007
941 A.2d 1019 (Del. 2007)

finding no plain error in the Superior Court's decision to grant the motion to withdraw the guilty plea permitting the defendant to exercise his constitutional right to a jury trial

Summary of this case from Capers v. State

denying Pringle’s claim that the Superior Court erred in refusing to allow Pringle to represent himself because "[t]he record, however, does not support a finding that Pringle requested to represent himself. In fact, the motion included in Pringle’s appendix reflects that, after his conviction, he requested that trial counsel be discharged and that new counsel be appointed to represent him at sentencing"

Summary of this case from Thomas v. State
Case details for

Pringle v. State

Case Details

Full title:Pringle v. State

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Dec 17, 2007

Citations

941 A.2d 1019 (Del. 2007)

Citing Cases

Pringle v. State

"[G]iven the timing of Pringle's motion, the State's lack of opposition to it, and the reasons Pringle set…

Thomas v. State

Finally, Thomas declined to proceed pro se once given the opportunity at his sentencing hearing.Id.; Pringle…