Opinion
M. P. No. 74-240.
October 31, 1974.
Pucci Goldin, Edward S. Goldin, Samuel A. Olevson, for petitioners.
Tillinghast, Collins Graham, Edward J. Regan, for respondents.
With respect to the proving of undue hardship, substantial deprivation of all beneficial use of one's property is not the standard to be used in determining whether one is entitled to a variance. The standard established is complete deprivation of all beneficial use. Smith v. Zoning Board of Review, 104 R.I. 1, 241 A.2d 288 (1968).
It is the judgment of the court that the instant petition for a writ of certiorari does not set forth any error by the Superior Court in the application of the proper standard, and it is therefore denied.