From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Fl. Dept. of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 10, 1999
727 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

holding that where the proceedings below are civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141 are not applicable

Summary of this case from Smith v. State

Opinion

No. 99-318

Opinion filed March 10, 1999

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Seeking Belated Appeal — Original Jurisdiction.

Gary Powell, pro se, petitioner.

No appearance for respondents.


Gary Powell petitions this court for a belated appeal of orders denying his petition for writ of mandamus/habeas corpus. Because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j) are not applicable. We therefore deny the petition, but do so without prejudice to Powell's right to seek relief in the trial court. See Brown v. State, 708 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Snelson v. Snelson, 440 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

ERVIN, BOOTH, and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Powell v. Fl. Dept. of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 10, 1999
727 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

holding that where the proceedings below are civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141 are not applicable

Summary of this case from Smith v. State

holding that where the proceedings below are civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate procedure 9.141 are not applicable

Summary of this case from Blaxton v. Escambia Sheriff's Office

holding that a motion for belated appeal in a criminal proceeding, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j) (currently Rule 9.141(c)), was inapplicable to an appeal from an order denying a habeas petition, a civil proceeding, and thus denying the motion without prejudice to appellant's right to file a Motion for Relief from Judgment, pursuant to Rule 1.540(b).

Summary of this case from Sumler v. State

determining that appellate court could not grant petition seeking belated appeal of order entered in a civil matter

Summary of this case from Charo v. Sanders

denying a petition for belated appeal without prejudice to seek relief in the trial court stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141 are not applicable

Summary of this case from Garland v. Lord

denying a petition for belated appeal and stating that proceedings resulting in orders denying an inmate's petition for writ of mandamus/habeas corpus were civil in nature, and thus, appellate rule governing petitions seeking belated appeal in criminal cases did not apply

Summary of this case from Floyd v. McNeil

stating that the predecessor provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) were not applicable to civil proceedings

Summary of this case from Edwards v. Inch

stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable

Summary of this case from Welch v. Dep't of Corr.

stating that because the mandamus proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable

Summary of this case from Tidwell v. State

stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j) (now rule 9.141(c)) are not applicable

Summary of this case from Yakymiw v. Huguet

stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable

Summary of this case from Chestnut v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable

Summary of this case from McCutcheon v. Fla. Parole Comm'n

stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable

Summary of this case from McCutcheon v. Fla. Parole Comm'n

stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable

Summary of this case from Woodson v. State

stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable

Summary of this case from Woodson v. State
Case details for

Powell v. Fl. Dept. of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:GARY POWELL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 10, 1999

Citations

727 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Bowers v. Secretary, Florida Dep't of Corrections

Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c) currently governs petitions seeking belated appeals in collateral or post-conviction…

Young v. Tucker

The petition seeking belated appeal is denied. See Powell v. Florida Department of Corrections, 727 So.2d…