Summary
concluding that where vocational rehabilitation expert relied “on the mere fact of his experience” to support his conclusions and essentially asked the court “to take his word for it,” such a “subjective, conclusory approach” could not “reasonably be assessed for reliability”
Summary of this case from Stepien v. RaimondoOpinion
Case No. CV 09-729-JFW (VBKx)
09-24-2012
Fred Powell, Plaintiff, v. Anheuser-Busch Incorporated, et al., Defendant.
JUDGMENT
The Court, having granted the Defendant Anheuser-Busch Inc.'s motion for summary judgment based on its determination that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defendant Anheuser-Busch Inc. was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all claims for relief alleged against it,
IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that judgment is entered in this action as follows:
1. Plaintiff Fred Powell shall recover nothing from the named Defendant;
2. Defendant Anheuser-Busch Inc. shall have judgment in its favor on Plaintiff Fred Powell's entire action; and
3. Defendant Anheuser-Busch Inc. shall recover from Plaintiff Fred Powell its costs of suit in the sum of $ __________.
The Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment.
_______________
JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE