From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Bryant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1998
256 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 14, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Murphy, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, that branch of the defendant's motion which was to dismiss the third cause of action is denied, and the third cause of action is reinstated.

The Supreme Court found that the plaintiff K.P. Home Builders, Inc., was barred from enforcing the subject custom home construction contract because the contract did not include certain information required by General Business Law § 771 Gen. Bus.. However, upon our review of the contract, we find that there was clearly a meeting of the minds between the parties, and that none of the alleged omissions from the written agreement caused the defendants to enter into the contract or were relevant to their stated reasons for terminating the plaintiff's services. Under these circumstances, the contract is not per se unenforceable and plaintiffs should not be precluded from the opportunity to establish the merit of their cause of action predicated upon breach of contract (see, Wowaka Sons v. Pardell, 242 A.D.2d 1; cf., Mindich Developers v. Milstein, 227 A.D.2d 536).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Porter v. Bryant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1998
256 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Porter v. Bryant

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH J. PORTER et al., Appellants, v. RONALD BRYANT et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 582

Citing Cases

TR Construction v. Fischer

The Court is aware of other cases in the Second Department upholding construction agreements notwithstanding…

ISLAND WIDE HEATING v. Sachs

The contract indicates that there was a clear meeting of the minds between the parties. Under the…