From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polanco v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 2007
41 A.D.3d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1322.

June 12, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered October 17, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Cohen, Kuhn Associates, New York (Michael V. DiMartini of counsel), for appellant.

Jose R. Mendez, Rego Park, for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in finding that plaintiff had set forth a meritorious cause of action and a reasonable excuse for failing to seek entry of a default judgment during settlement discussions, which were still ongoing just prior to defendant's moving to dismiss ( see Finkelstein v East 65th St. Laundromat, 215 AD2d 178).


Summaries of

Polanco v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 2007
41 A.D.3d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Polanco v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:FELIX POLANCO, Respondent, v. RUSSELL SCOTT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 12, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5164
836 N.Y.S.2d 409

Citing Cases

Wachsman v. Catcendix Corp.

Vazquez v. Beharry, 82 A.D.3d 649 (1st Dep't 2011); Finkelstein v. East 65th Street Laundromat, 215 A.D.2d…

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Mendez

Under these circumstances, an attempt to settle constitutes a reasonable excuse for delay in answering. See…