From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 448 (Or. 1998)

Summary

holding that fanny packs were containers "intended primarily to store valuables" in a general sense and, therefore, excepted from the Atkinson prohibition

Summary of this case from State v. Barnett

Opinion

1998.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 448 (Or. 1998)

holding that fanny packs were containers "intended primarily to store valuables" in a general sense and, therefore, excepted from the Atkinson prohibition

Summary of this case from State v. Barnett

holding that a fanny pack was lawfully inventoried where the relevant city ordinance provided that fanny packs could be inventoried

Summary of this case from State v. Swanson

upholding inventory conducted pursuant to authorization in the Gresham City Code, which described in detail the circumstances in which custodial inventories were to occur and the scope of such inventories

Summary of this case from State v. Haney

reviewing for legal error trial court's determination of the scope of sentencing authority

Summary of this case from State v. Sierra

invoking and applying Cheek formulation in concluding that the state had presented legally sufficient evidence that the defendant's law firm with which, during the relevant period, “[b]etween one and three attorneys” were associated, constituted an ORICO “enterprise” and that “defendant had committed the predicate acts charged through the enterprise of his law office”

Summary of this case from State v. Walker

noting that first-degree manslaughter includes the lesser-included offenses of second-degree manslaughter, which requires a mental state of recklessness, and criminally negligent homicide, which requires a mental state of criminal negligence

Summary of this case from State v. Delcurto

setting out standard of review

Summary of this case from State v. Schwartz
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1998

Citations

327 Or. 448 (Or. 1998)

Citing Cases

State v. Rutledge

"[T]he briefcase and the coin purse [found in the briefcase] in this case are not `closed, opaque containers'…

State v. Cruz–Renteria

The significance of the additional adverb is inscrutable, in that, as a practical matter, appellate decisions…