holding evidence that accused drove his car on wrong side of street, through stop signs, with no lights on, and at high rates of speed demonstrated total disregard for all rules of safety and exhibited shocking indifference to persons or other vehicles during his flight from police and also demonstrated careless disregard for all vehicles parked along streets through which police chased accused
Summary of this case from Com. v. Anderson1987
holding evidence that accused drove his car on wrong side of street, through stop signs, with no lights on, and at high rates of speed demonstrated total disregard for all rules of safety and exhibited shocking indifference to persons or other vehicles during his flight from police and also demonstrated careless disregard for all vehicles parked along streets through which police chased accused
Summary of this case from Com. v. Andersonexplaining that Commonwealth v. Hatfield has been superceded by changes to the Rules of Criminal Procedure
Summary of this case from Com. v. DoughertyFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1987
The only proof necessary to establish reckless driving is that the Appellant drove a vehicle in careless…
Com. v. PoindexterAppellant fails to allege that the witnesses were available and prepared to cooperate and testify for the…