From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Weeks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 1965
23 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

March 15, 1965


In a coram nobis proceeding, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered August 12, 1963, which denied after a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered July 16, 1957 after a jury trial, convicting him of selling and possessing narcotic drugs as a felony, in violation of section 1751 of the Penal Law, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Order affirmed. Defendant claimed that his retained counsel promised to file and serve a timely notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction. After a plenary hearing upon this issue the trial court, upon the evidence adduced, found that counsel had made no promise and had given no assurance that he would file a notice of appeal or undertake to prosecute an appeal on behalf of the defendant. In our opinion, the proof amply supports this finding. In any event, even if counsel had promised and thereafter neglected to file and serve a timely notice of appeal, such unkept promise by counsel would be insufficient basis to justify vacating the judgment or sentence ( People v. Marchese, 14 N.Y.2d 695, affg. 19 A.D.2d 728; People v. Kling, 14 N.Y.2d 571, affg. 19 A.D.2d 750; People v. Smith, 22 A.D.2d 924; People v. Augusta, 22 A.D.2d 925). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Weeks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 1965
23 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

People v. Weeks

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATHAN WEEKS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 15, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

United States v. Follette

That such is the understanding of the New York courts is demonstrated by their citation of Kling in…

United States ex rel. Berman v. Gilligan

In the courts of New York a writ of error coram nobis or comparable relief will not be granted where its…