From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Augusta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1964
22 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

December 21, 1964


Motion by defendant pro se for leave to dispense with printing, for assignment of counsel and for enlargement of time to prosecute appeal from judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered June 15, 1964. The motion is dismissed. There is no appeal pending. It appears that a timely notice of appeal has neither been filed nor served. The court cannot extend the time to appeal even if, as claimed by defendant in this case, the failure to take a timely appeal is due to the negligence of the attorney retained by the defendant for the purpose of the appeal (cf. People v. Kling, 14 N.Y.2d 571, affg. 19 A.D.2d 750; People v. Marchese, 14 N.Y.2d 695, affg. 19 A.D.2d 728). Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Augusta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1964
22 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

People v. Augusta

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES C. AUGUSTA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1964

Citations

22 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

United States v. Follette

That such is the understanding of the New York courts is demonstrated by their citation of Kling in…

United States ex rel. Berman v. Gilligan

In the courts of New York a writ of error coram nobis or comparable relief will not be granted where its…