From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court properly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress the showup identification made by the injured complainant at the hospital. At the time of the identification, the police were informed that it was likely that the complainant would die. Therefore, exigent circumstances existed to justify the showup ( see, People v. Riley, 70 N.Y.2d 523; People v. Pringle, 226 A.D.2d 1072).

The court also properly held that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant. The defendant was arrested based on the information provided by a citizen accusing the defendant of being involved in a shooting ( see, People v. McCain, 134 A.D.2d 623; People v. Phillips, 120 A.D.2d 621).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either without merit or relate to harmless error.

Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PETE TAYLOR, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 906

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the suppression court properly…

People v. Matthew

Since the parties were known to each other prior to the incident, the identification was merely confirmatory…