Opinion
2018–05306 Ind. No. 3391/16
11-12-2020
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Ricardo STEWART, appellant.
Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Rachel L. Pecker of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.
Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Rachel L. Pecker of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ROBERT J. MILLER, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), imposed January 29, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant has completed the term of imprisonment imposed and, thus, his contention that this portion of the sentence was excessive has been rendered academic (see People v. Worrell, 158 A.D.3d 828, 828, 68 N.Y.S.3d 915 ; People v. Stockinger, 131 A.D.3d 550, 551, 14 N.Y.S.3d 712 ). The period of postrelease supervision imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).
MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.