From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stockinger

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 12, 2015
131 A.D.3d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

08-12-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Scot H. STOCKINGER, appellant.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Karla Lato of counsel), for respondent.


Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Karla Lato of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), imposed July 16, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant has completed the term of imprisonment imposed and, thus, his contention that this portion of the sentence was excessive has been rendered academic (see People v. Russillo, 27 A.D.3d 493, 494, 812 N.Y.S.2d 574 ).

The period of postrelease supervision imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Stockinger

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 12, 2015
131 A.D.3d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Stockinger

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Scot H. STOCKINGER, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 12, 2015

Citations

131 A.D.3d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6525
14 N.Y.S.3d 712

Citing Cases

People v. Zapata

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed. The defendant has completed the term of imprisonment imposed upon…

People v. Zapata

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed. The defendant has completed the term of imprisonment imposed upon…