From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stefano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1990
159 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 16, 1990

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Egan, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law, defendant's motion denied and indictment reinstated. Memorandum: County Court granted defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds, and the People appeal. The issue is whether a 14-day period between August 24, 1988 and September 7, 1988 should be excluded from the computation of time in which the People were required to be ready for trial (see, CPL 30.30 [a]). The parties agree that if the period is excluded, the People announced readiness for trial on the record in a timely manner.

Following his arraignment on August 23, 1988 on felony complaints charging aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [a]) and felony driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192, [5]), defendant appeared in Greece Town Court on August 24, 1988. Having learned that he was not eligible to be represented by the Public Defender, defendant told the court "I will try to get an attorney." The court properly adjourned the case to permit the defendant to obtain counsel (see, CPL 180.10, [4], [5]). On September 7, 1988, defendant again appeared in Town Court without an attorney. He told the court that he had an attorney but he asked for a further adjournment in order to finalize the necessary financial arrangements. The adjournment was granted, but the parties agree, at least for the purposes of this appeal, that on September 7, 1988 the case was waived to the Grand Jury. The District Attorney concedes that the time between September 7, 1988 and March 1, 1989, when the District Attorney announced readiness for trial, must be charged to the People.

County Court erred in dismissing the indictment. The 14-day period at issue should have been excluded as a "period during which the defendant [was] without counsel through no fault of the court" (CPL 30.30 [f]; see, People v Boyd, 116 A.D.2d 978, affd 68 N.Y.2d 613; see also, People v Sepulveda, 147 A.D.2d 720, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 669; People v Lloyd, 141 A.D.2d 669, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 787; People v Lloyd, 141 A.D.2d 671, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 920; People v Hughes, 136 A.D.2d 916; People v Greene, 134 A.D.2d 612, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 897). The indictment must be reinstated.


Summaries of

People v. Stefano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1990
159 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Stefano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. STEVEN STEFANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. Woodward

Defendant was arraigned on a felony complaint on October 3, 1992, and the matter was adjourned to October 15,…

People v. Reinhardt

In order to allow defendant to obtain counsel, that court adjourned the matter until February 6, 1990, the…