From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Boyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 24, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Mark, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, O'Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The hearing court properly denied defendants' motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that they had been denied their statutory right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.30, 210.20 Crim. Proc.). The court properly excluded from the statutory six-month time period (CPL 30.30 [a]) the 32 days that the case was initially adjourned in Lackawanna City Court to allow defendants to secure the services of an attorney (CPL 30.30 [f]) and thereafter further adjourned at the request of, or with the consent of, the defendants or their counsel for the purpose of scheduling a preliminary hearing (People v Worley, 66 N.Y.2d 523; People v Pressley, 115 A.D.2d 228; People v Campbell, 96 A.D.2d 725; see, People v Sturgis, 38 N.Y.2d 625). In addition, the record fully supports the court's exclusion of that period of time between defendants' postindictment request for a 45-day adjournment to make pretrial motions and the People's announcement on the record of their readiness for trial (CPL 30.30 [a], [b]). When these two time periods are excluded, the People were ready for trial within the statutory six-month period.


Summaries of

People v. Boyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES BOYD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Stefano

County Court erred in dismissing the indictment. The 14-day period at issue should have been excluded as a…

People v. Harris

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in People v Boyd ( 116 A.D.2d 978).…