From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Samuels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.

PRESENT: GREEN, A. P. J., WISNER, PIGOTT, JR., HURLBUTT AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court impermissibly penalized him for exercising his right to go to trial. "The imposition of a more severe sentence after trial than that offered to defendant pursuant to a plea offer that he rejected, without more, does not support the contention of defendant that he was penalized for exercising his right to go to trial" ( People v. Jones, 229 A.D.2d 980, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 925).


Summaries of

People v. Samuels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Samuels

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RAHSAAN M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 768

Citing Cases

People v. Taplin

We reject the contention of defendant that the court impermissibly enhanced his sentence based on his refusal…

People v. Lusby

County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's belated request for funds to hire a forensic…