From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lusby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1332 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

KA 02-01718.

December 31, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of Ontario County Court (Harvey, J.), entered July 17, 2002, convicting defendant after a jury trial of forgery in the second degree and attempted petit larceny.

JOHN E. TYO, SHORTSVILLE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (BRIAN D. DENNIS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Before: PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., SCUDDER, GORSKI, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by vacating the finding that defendant is a persistent felony offender and reducing the sentence imposed on forgery in the second degree to an indeterminate term of incarceration of 3½ to 7 years and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that the evidence that he signed a blank fingerprint card with a false name is legally insufficient to support his conviction of forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10; see People v. Van Schoick, 198 A.D.2d 907, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 811; see also People v. Kirk, 115 A.D.2d 758, affd 68 N.Y.2d 722). We reject the further contention of defendant that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's belated request for funds to hire a forensic toxicologist ( see People v. Drumgoole, 234 A.D.2d 888, 889-890, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1011; People v. Schneider, 188 A.D.2d 754, 756-757, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 892) . Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel ( see generally People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147). We reject the contention of defendant that the court penalized him for exercising his right to trial by imposing a more severe sentence than that offered pursuant to a plea bargain ( see People v. Samuels, 269 A.D.2d 859, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 925; People v. Jones, 229 A.D.2d 980, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 925). As a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, however, we modify the judgment by vacating the finding that defendant is a persistent felony offender and reducing the sentence imposed on the forgery count to an indeterminate term of incarceration of 3½ to 7 years ( see People v. Rivera, 166 A.D.2d 367, 368-369, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 842; see also People v. Clarke, 222 A.D.2d 1035, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 934).


Summaries of

People v. Lusby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1332 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Lusby

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. AARON LUSBY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 1332 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
769 N.Y.S.2d 804

Citing Cases

People v. Graves

The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Boyce, 2 A.D.3d 984, 985-986). The fact…

People v. Ellison

Here, given defendant's extensive criminal record, we cannot conclude that the court acted arbitrarily or…